<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ash v. Tyson</title>
	<link>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/</link>
	<description>The only mistake I regret, is the one I made twice.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: juicy13</title>
		<link>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>juicy13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jhosselinne because there was no reason for them not being hired if they were qualified for the job. The court should've been in favor of Anthony Ash and John Hithon because their was a lot of eveidence the said that they weren't hired because of discrimination. This case in my opinion was unconstitutional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jhosselinne because there was no reason for them not being hired if they were qualified for the job. The court should&#8217;ve been in favor of Anthony Ash and John Hithon because their was a lot of eveidence the said that they weren&#8217;t hired because of discrimination. This case in my opinion was unconstitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juan</title>
		<link>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Hey Its Juan! I think that the court made the right decision. The people did not hve enough evidence that they were more qualified and that they were called boy. Maybe the person who was hiring them felt their personality wasn't ight. Who knows. Well that's what I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Its Juan! I think that the court made the right decision. The people did not hve enough evidence that they were more qualified and that they were called boy. Maybe the person who was hiring them felt their personality wasn&#8217;t ight. Who knows. Well that&#8217;s what I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justo L.</title>
		<link>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Justo L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I think that Anthony Ash, and John Hilton should have kept their job, if they more qualified for the job. and that Tyson was being racist, and hired the other two dudes just because they were caucasian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Anthony Ash, and John Hilton should have kept their job, if they more qualified for the job. and that Tyson was being racist, and hired the other two dudes just because they were caucasian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASH VS. TYSON INC. &#124; C-R-I-S-T-I-A-N :)</title>
		<link>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>ASH VS. TYSON INC. &#124; C-R-I-S-T-I-A-N :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] Ash v. Tyson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ash v. Tyson [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesca</title>
		<link>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>This is a very common case. Racism has been around the world for centuries. I personally think that Ash and Hithon should've won the case. I know that the "no evidence" thing was the reason for their loss but how do they know that Tyson, Inc. was not racist too. Similar to the men, they had no evidence also. If anything, no one should've won the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very common case. Racism has been around the world for centuries. I personally think that Ash and Hithon should&#8217;ve won the case. I know that the &#8220;no evidence&#8221; thing was the reason for their loss but how do they know that Tyson, Inc. was not racist too. Similar to the men, they had no evidence also. If anything, no one should&#8217;ve won the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhonnya</title>
		<link>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>jhonnya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jhosselinner.learnerblogs.org/2008/04/01/ash-v-tyson/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I think that this case is not breaking the 14th Amendment because the Supreme Court did not have enough evidence to sue the Tyson Food Inc. The Supreme Court doesn't even know if the Caucasian people called the Afro- Americans "boy". This is what I think about the case. -Eduardo-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this case is not breaking the 14th Amendment because the Supreme Court did not have enough evidence to sue the Tyson Food Inc. The Supreme Court doesn&#8217;t even know if the Caucasian people called the Afro- Americans &#8220;boy&#8221;. This is what I think about the case. -Eduardo-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
